Genesis
18:1-10, Colossians 1:24-28, Luke 10:38-42
On the Gospel, Lord of
the Work and Work of the Lord
A
certain Catholic missionary was doing a very good job in his mission village in
the African interior. In a few years he had baptized many people and built a
church, a school and a health centre. Owing to his restless work schedule he
took ill and had to be flown back to his native country in Europe for
treatment. After many months he was well enough to return to Africa. To his
surprise and utter disappointment he discovered that the whole village had
abandoned his church and turned to a local evangelical preacher. Even the
church he built now had an evangelical signboard in front of it. “What went
wrong?” he asked himself. How did his flourishing mission collapse overnight.
“What did I do wrong?” he asked his former church members. The truth hit home
one day when a woman said to him, “Father, you did a lot for us. You gave our
children clothes and built up our village. But there was one thing you did not
do. You did not bring us to know Jesus as our personal Lord and Saviour.” Doing
the work of the Lord is great. But knowing the Lord of the work comes first.
Today’s
gospel is the story of two sisters, Martha who is busy with the work of the
Lord, and Mary who is more interested in knowing the Lord of the work. For
Martha service comes first, for Mary relationship comes first. Like the
missionary in our story, Martha must have been shocked to hear the Lord himself
saying that it is relationship with him that comes first, for without it our
service is meaningless.
There
are people who see Martha in this story as the material girl and Mary as the
spiritual one. The association of Martha with materialism is easier to make in
the English language where the name Martha seems to rhyme with the word
“matter.” But this way of thinking in terms of separation between spirit and
matter does not belong to the gospel of Luke. Rather Luke presents Martha and
Mary as two sisters who are both interested in the Lord, two women who both
want to please the Lord. The difference between them is the manner in which
they go about trying to please the Lord. Martha takes the way of service or
working for the Lord. Mary takes the way of relationship or being with the
Lord.
Mark
tells us that when Jesus called the apostles to follow him, he called them for
a dual purpose: “to be with him, and to be sent out to proclaim the message”
(Mark 3:14). The need, on the one hand, to be with the Lord, to know him, to
fellowship with him and be nourished by his word and, on the other hand, to do
the Lord’s work, to serve the Lord in others, to proclaim his message of love
in word and deed, brings us to a conflict. Which one comes first? How much of
my time should I devote to being with the Lord, to prayer and listening to
God’s word, and how much time to doing the work of the Lord? In spite of the urgent
need to throw ourselves into the work of the Lord, it is only logical to say
that my relationship with the Lord of the work comes before my involvement with
the work of the Lord.
The
point of the story of Jesus with May and Martha is not to invite us to choose
between being a Martha or a Mary. The true disciple needs to be both Martha and
Mary. The point of the story is to challenge our priorities so that we come to
see that fellowship with the Lord, being with the Lord and hearing his word
should always precede the work we do for the Lord. Do we have a program of
daily fellowship with the Lord? Many people fulfill this by assisting daily in
the Eucharist where they can also hear the word of God. Others schedule a holy
hour or quiet time when they can pray and read the word of God. Whatever way we
fulfill this need, today’s gospel invites all Christians first to be a Mary who
sits with devotion at the Lord’s feet listening his word, and then also to be a
Martha who throws herself with energy into the business of serving the Lord.
On
the Epistle, The Church as the Body of Christ
William
Barclay, a famous Bible scholar, has this beautiful illustration of the
relationship between Christ and the church:
Suppose
a great doctor discovers a cure for cancer. Once that cure is found, it is
there. But before it can become available for everyone, it must be taken out to
the world. Doctors and surgeons must know about it and be trained to use it.
The cure is there, but one person cannot take it out to all the world; a corps
of doctors must be the agents whereby it arrives at all the world’s sufferers.
That
precisely is what the church is to Jesus Christ. It is in Jesus that all people
and all nations can be reconciled to God. But before that can happen, they must
know about Jesus Christ, and it is the task of the church to bring that about.
Christ is the head; the church is the body. The head must have a body through
which it can work. The church is quite literally hands to do Christ’s work,
feet to run upon His errands, and a voice to speak His words.
The
identity of Christ with the church was the first lesson that Paul learnt in his
life as a Christian. Before his conversion Paul, then known as Saul, saw
Christians as a bunch of infidels deserving of death. When Christ appeared to
him in a vision as he rode to Damascus to persecute the Christians there,
Christ’s first words to him were: “Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?” (Acts
9:4) The voice came from heaven, so how could Saul be persecuting Christ on
earth? Paul then understood that the heavenly Christ and the earthly church are
one and the same thing. What you do to the church you do to Christ.
The
vision on the way to Damascus taught Paul that even though Christ was already
enjoying divine glory with the heavenly Father, it was still possible for him
to suffer through the suffering of Christians. That is how Paul came to the
realization that the church is the body of Christ. When he says in today’s
second reading from the letter to the Colossians that “in my flesh I am
completing what is lacking in Christ's afflictions for the sake of his body,
that is, the church (Colossians 1:24),” he does not mean that the
suffering of Christ by which he redeemed us was deficient. He only meant to
underline the fact that so long as Christians are suffering persecution in this
world, Christ was still suffering, in his body, that is. When we realize that
Paul wrote this letter from prison (verse 4:3) in Rome where he and other
Christians were still being persecuted for their faith, then we see why he
understands their suffering as Christ’s ongoing suffering. When Christians
suffer, Christ suffers.
Paul
says of the church, “I became its servant according to God's commission
that was given to me for you (verse 1:25).” For Paul being a servant of
Christ and being a servant of the church are one and the same thing. There is
no separating Christ and the church. What you do for the church you do for
Christ.
There
is a funny game in which people are asked, “If you were a fruit, what fruit
would you be, and why?” Some say they would like to be a mango, delicious and
irresistible; others that they would love to be an apple, hard but good for
your health, and yet others a cactus fruit, thorny on the outside, but
delicious in the inside. Today, we could play a similar game. If you are the
body of Christ, what part of Christ’s body are you? Are you Christ’s feet
bringing him to other people, like the Eucharistic ministers bringing Holy
Communion to the sick? Are you Christ’s hand wiping away the tears of the
afflicted or helping to put a roof over the head of the homeless? Or are you
Christ’s mouth announcing Good News to the poor? As a church we are Christ’s
body. As an individual, what part of Christ’s body are you? What are you
contributing to the well-being of Christ in his body, the church? Each of us is
invited to answer this question for himself or herself today.
No comments:
Post a Comment
DISCLAIMER: Comments, remarks and observations are allowed to enable my readers freely express their opinions concerning issues raised in this post. However, while I recommend the observance of the rule of courtesy for every comment, comments on this post do not in any way express my personal opinion. They are strictly the opinions of those who made the comments.